|
| With
Sony projectors, Boston
University faculty tap into a wealth of online
multimedia resources |
| Scott
Gardiner |
|

|
For all the impact the
Internet and other online resources
have had in academia, access has typically
been confined to the computer desktop.
On most campuses, the technology has
been limited to use as a research
tool for individual studies.
Recently, such server-based
resources have been freed to reach
beyond research and into classroom
teaching. At Boston University, Sony’s
VPL-FX50 network projectors are bringing
traditional audiovisual equipped classrooms
to a new stage of evolution. The recommendation
to add Sony network projectors to
BU classrooms was facilitated by local
integrator and A/V communications
specialist HB Communications, based
in North Haven, CT.
Much as the Internet has transformed
standalone computer labs, the Sony
VPL-FX50 projector’s networking capability
is opening up isolated classrooms
to the
|
|
wealth of multimedia
materials available online. Across
academic disciplines, educators at
BU are developing a new style of teaching
as they realize the potential of working
with a digital chalkboard.
Managers are also discovering
benefits. Advances in technology often
add complexity and, with it, maintenance
issues. An IP-enabled device, the
VPL-FX50 projector can be accessed
remotely to implement a proactive
service program that increases uptime,
while reducing operating costs.
|
|
Three Disciplines,
One Projector
|
|
Before
installing Sony’s networked projectors,
BU already had a major investment in
A/V teaching technology. Across campus,
130 classrooms are set up for projection.
Of those, 81 have permanent projector
installations. In the past year, 12
were upgraded with the VPL- FX50 model
bringing new opportunities to teachers
already vested in using display technology.
“My classes require a classroom with
a projector,” says David Whittier, assistant
professor at BU’s School of Education,
Department of Curriculum Teaching. “At
this point in my teaching, it is not
an option. If I’m going to teach in
the way I want to, I need a classroom
with a rojector. Many of my teaching
resources are |
| I
use them routinely to illustrate concepts,
to visualize people and historical events
I often go to web sites to web sites
to elaborate on a subject or to point
students to additional resources.” |
| The
move to computer-based content has eased
the mechanics of managing material. |
 |
“I used to use a lot of overhead
transparencies and a lot more video,”
Whittier says. “In some cases, I’ve
been able to digitize video and put
it on the computer. More often, it’s
just as easy to use something I’ve
found on the web or to capture material
and put it into PowerPoint. Computing
has made it easier to store, search
and retrieve material than when I
used a lot of slides and overheads.”
As director of the university’s Educational
Media and Technology program, Whittier
takes these techniques seriously as
he trains the next generation of teachers.
|
|
“We are developing resources to help
teachers help students learn better,”
he says. “Computing and projectors
are a crucial resource integrated
and folded into the work that we do.
It is a tremendous development in
the history of education.
“The Sony projector’s networkable
design opens up the next stage in
that development,” he adds. “The newest
frontier is databases. We’re just
starting to teach teachers to develop
their own web searchable databases.
That brings the curriculum almost
entirely into a computer-based format.
In the future, the material won’t
even start as books. It is so much
faster and economical to develop and
distribute content on computer networks.
Teachers can move freely from classroom
to classroom and have pinpoint access
to material.”
Classroom display systems enhance
teaching across the disciplines. For
Raymond Levy, coordinator for emergency
medical services in the Physical Education
& Recreation Department, Sony’s
projection technology allows him to
connect with today’s students in a
way that speaks to them.
“To reach these students from the
MTV generation, you have to stimulate
them visually,” Levy says. “They need
to see what we’re talking about. This
is especially important with emergency
medical services. Pictures of wounds
and patients reach them. Attention
spans are getting shorter and this
seems to hold onto their attention
in class.”
Keeping students focused also means
removing distractions like having
to turn off the lights to make presentations
visible.
With its exceptional 3500 ANSI lumens
brightness, the VPL-FX50 projector
allows educators to illuminate their
points seamlessly. (ANSI lumens is
a measuring method developed for the
American National Standards Institute.
Since there is no uniform method of
reporting brightness, specifications
will vary among manufacturers.)
“We can see images in a well lit
classroom,” Levy says. “Since we don’t
need to be in darkness to see the
projector, students can take notes
and review the textbook as needed.”
|
Levy sees this projection technology
as a natural evolution in one of the
oldest display technologies—the chalkboard.
“Multimedia capability has become a
necessary part of teaching in higher
education,” he says. “Projectors are
fast becoming the digital chalkboard
in the classroom.” |
|
|
Some areas in academia have taken
the lead in bringing multimedia presentations
to the curriculum. Patricia Johnson,
an assistant professor in Classical
Studies at BU, has watched the new
technology reshape her work.
“Technology has been a boon for classics
generally and especially the kind
of courses I teach,” says Johnson.
“When I took these courses in college,
the professors used slides. If we
wanted to study them for exams, we
might be able to look at them in the
art library.”
This awkward arrangement limited
the slides’ value.
“Typically, the visuals were an addition—an
unnecessary addition to a course on
Roman civilization,” Johnson adds.
“Basically, it was a course on Roman
history with some visuals to keep
you awake during the long class hour.
That’s about it.”
For Johnson, display technology has
changed a frill into a fundamental
element. “Now, we can fully integrate
imagery into our course curriculum,”
she says. “In my Roman civilization
class, it has become part of the required
material. After the images are shown
in class, they go up on the web. Then
we use the projector during the exams.
For the first time, we’re really able
to present visual material as an integral
part of the material of classics,
instead of it being a pretty addition.”
By integrating the visual, courses
fit the subject better.
“Instead of being treated as a history
course, it has become similar to an
art history class,” Johnson says.
“But we can show more than just art
objects. My students know their way
around Pompeii at the end of the term.
That would have been unimaginable
10 or 20 years ago. We bring the ancient
world into the classroom in a way
that wasn’t possible before.” This
is especially important given the
other impressions students receive
from outside school. “They all have
seen films like Gladiator or Spartacus.
They all know Hollywood’s reconstruction
of the ancient world, of what Hollywood
imagines it was like to be a gladiator
in a gladiatorial school. What they
haven’t seen is a reality. I show
them the pictures of those places,
cages in the Coliseum where gladiators
were held before being sent upstairs
to fight. They’re the size of a large
dog cage. Students get the real picture,
and not just what Hollywood has presented
to them.”
Being able to bring online imagery
into the curriculum is also key because
of changes in scholastic publishing.
Today, discoveries are available online
years before they appear in book form.
For some material, this is the only
chance to get a glimpse into these
lost worlds.
“Classical archeology has led the
way because of the tremendous expense
of publishing texts,” says Johnson.
“Scholars have been great about putting
their material on web pages. So for
teaching, the web is the future for
us.”
|
|
|
|
|